Missing the Obvious
Lone Ranger and Tonto
The Lone Ranger and Tonto are
camping in the desert, set up their tent, and are asleep. Some hours
later, The Lone Ranger wakes his faithful friend.
"Tonto, look up and tell me what you see."
Tonto replies, "Me see millions of stars."
"What does that tell you?" asks The Lone Ranger.
Tonto ponders for a minute.
"Astronomically speaking, it tells me that there are millions of
galaxies and potentially billions of planets.
Astrologically, it tells me that Saturn is in Leo.
Time wise, it appears to be approximately a quarter past three.
Theologically, it's evident the Lord is all powerful and we are small and
insignificant.
Meteorologically, it seems we will have a beautiful day tomorrow.
What it tell you, Kemo Sabi?"
The Lone Ranger is silent for a moment, then speaks.
"Tonto, you Dumb Hoss, someone has stolen our tent."
The above joke is a good lesson in missing the obvious. Chances are that you were surprised by the Lone Ranger's response. However, the first sentence of the joke tells you that the Lone Ranger and Tonto were camping in a tent. It should have been clear at Tonto's first response that he was missing the obvious.
Likewise, those who have already decided that God does not exist and that all processes must have a naturalistic explanation, do not see the obvious evidence that the universe was designed, rather than happened by chance. As discussed on another page, rational explanations for the creation of the universe come down to two main possibilities:
- Design by an intelligent being
- Happened by random chance
What are the differences between the two creators?
| Characteristic | God | Super Universe |
| Transcendence | Yes | Yes |
| Eternal | Yes | Yes |
| Creation of Universe | Designed | Random |
| Intelligence | High | Stupid |
What we see in the table is a comparison of the two possible types of creators. Both creators must possess certain characteristics in common, such as being eternal and being transcendent to this universe. However, the naturalistic creator must be "stupid" and must have created our exquisitely-designed universe through some sort of random process. For some reason, the atheist chooses to believe that the universe arose randomly by the action of a stupid creator, instead of seeing the obvious - that a well-designed universe would most likely come into being through the actions of an intelligent designer. Let me give you an example. I show you a computer and ask you to make your best choice as to how it came into being:
- Designed and put together by intelligent human beings.
- Random computer parts were put into a large box and the parts soldered randomly by spraying molten lead into the box as it was rotated. This process was continued many times until the computer happened to be produced.
Well, its your choice. Have you checked your tent lately?
Today's New Reason to Believe
Integrating Science and Faith
- 02/09/2012 12:23 PM
TNRTB Classic: Rodents Are a Good Thing
It goes against human nature to feel gratitude for mice and rats—nevertheless, there are a lot of reasons to be thankful for rodents. This Monday I discussed the benefits mankind and the environment have received from beavers. For more reasons to thank God for rodents, check out this previous article on breakthrough research conducted on … Read more
() - 02/06/2012 09:17 AM
Thank God for Beaver Dams
A recent study helped reveal the importance of beaver dams. Yet as a native of Canada, I have always been thankful for these furry rodents and their dams. (The beaver is the national animal of Canada and is depicted on the Canadian nickel.) For two centuries the fur trade supported Canada’s economy—and almost all that … Read more
() - 02/02/2012 09:55 AM
TNRTB Classic: Thinking About Cloning
A few days ago I proposed a theological framework to help Christians think about synthetic biology and the creation of life in the lab. It is also important that believers know how to think about advances in other areas of biotechnology. One controversial area of particular concern is cloning. Below is a link to a … Read more
() - 01/30/2012 12:49 AM
A Theology for Synthetic Biology, Part 2 (of 2)
With the creation of artificial life in the lab on the horizon, many people—Christians in particular—are asking if synthetic biology is a safe and ethical discipline. Most importantly, they ask, “Are scientists playing God?” It has become apparent to me that the best way to address these questions is by establishing a theology for synthetic … Read more
() - 01/26/2012 12:15 PM
TNRTB Classic: Cell Blueprints
A few days ago I asserted that the creation of artificial life in the laboratory demonstrates that the genesis of life requires the work of intelligent agency. Success in synthetic biology, whether from the bottom-up or top-down, requires the work of highly trained scientists who rely on several hundred years of scientific knowledge. In the … Read more
() - 01/23/2012 12:41 AM
A Theology for Synthetic Biology, Part 1 (of 2)
It’s just a matter of time before synthetic biologists create artificial life in the lab. This endeavor causes many Christians concern and raises a number of important philosophical and theological questions. It has become apparent to me that there is a need for a theology for synthetic biology. Part 1 of this series provides an … Read more
() - 01/19/2012 12:08 PM
TNRTB Classic: Big Bang Cosmology
On Monday I discussed a recent discovery that boosts confidence in the big bang theory. Numerous tests of increasingly detailed aspects continue to affirm the model and, thus, give scientists a good reason for assurance in the validity of big bang cosmology. This previous TNRTB discusses confidence-boosting discoveries from the past 20 years and shows … Read more
() - 01/16/2012 12:38 AM
Gas Clouds Found Sans Metals
Four minutes after the big bang, hydrogen and helium constituted the only elements in the universe (except for minute amounts of lithium). No heavier elements—which astronomers refer to as “metals”—existed until the first stars formed a few hundred million years later. The initially fruitless search for gas clouds that reflect this lack of metals cast … Read more
() - 01/12/2012 09:07 AM
Podcast Highlight: Busy as a Beaver
If you were asked to name an animal that has greatly impacted the economic growth of the North American nations, would beavers come to mind? If not, they definitely should. Thanks to ground-penetrating radar readings from satellites, scientists have discovered that beaver dams—once abundant throughout North America—were instrumental in the subterranean sediment buildups that comprise this continent. In … Read more
() - 01/09/2012 09:33 AM
Podcast Highlight: The Elephant in the Room
Does the elephant’s sixth “toe”represent an example of common descent or common design? Recent extensive research, using modern technologies, weighs in on a centuries-long debate over the origin and purpose of the elephant’s sixth toe. Fossil records indicate that the toe first appeared in elephant anatomy 40 million years ago when elephantine species began to … Read more
()
http://www.godandscience.org//apologetics/obvious.html
Last Modified March 10, 2005
Top of Page 
Back