<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Evidence for God from Science</title>
		<link>http://www.godandscience.org/</link>
		<description>Provides evidence for the existence of God and the reliability of the Bible from scientific studies.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 04:15:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		<atom:link href="http://www.godandscience.org/godandscience.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Does Analytic Thinking Threaten Belief in God?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/analytic_thinking_faith.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/analytic_thinking_faith.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 04:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Canadian researchers claim that analytic tasks (vs. intuitive tasks) promote religious disbelief. However, what they really showed was that group of female unbelievers subjected to stressful analytic tasks increased their disbelief in God.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Book Review: 7 Truths that Changed the World: Discovering Christianity's Most Dangerous Ideas by Kenneth Samples</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/7_truths_that_changed_the_world.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/7_truths_that_changed_the_world.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>7 Truths that Changed the World is an examination of how Christianity has radically changed our world for the better with its unique and &quot;dangerous&quot; ideas. It is also a good resource to get Christians and non-Christians thinking about the big questions of life and how one's worldview addresses those questions.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>&quot;After Birth Abortion&quot;: Infanticide (Killing Babies) is Okay According to Doctors</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/infanticide_baby_killing.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/infanticide_baby_killing.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Two medical doctors have proposed renaming infanticide to 'after birth abortion' and declare that it should be legalized for an unspecified period of time after the birth of any child (including those who are perfectly healthy).</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How Old is the Earth According to the Bible and Science?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/age_of_the_earth.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/age_of_the_earth.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Many Christians believe the Bible says the earth is 6,000 years old. In reality, the Bible says humanity is at least 50,000 years old and science tells us the other creation 'days' are millions of years old.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Confessions of a Pro-Life Atheist - Why Abortion Rights is not a Religious Question</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/pro-life_atheist.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/pro-life_atheist.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>As a pro-life atheist, my pro-life beliefs belong to the discoveries in science. While I am sympathetic to women's rights and would even consider myself a Feminist as would any man who believes in gender equality, the right to life outweighs our personal discomforts.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Did Scientists Evolve a Multicellular Organism from a Single-Celled Organism?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/multicellular_evolution.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/multicellular_evolution.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Scientists claimed to have 'evolved' multicellular organisms in a few days through simple laboratory selection. A more likely explanation is that these yeasts conscripted genes already present that form pseudohyphae naturally. Sheering forces from culture shaking likely account for the cell death that resulted in the release of 'juvenile' 'offspring.'</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nostradamus Predictions 2012: The Greatest Prophet of Modern Times?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/nostradamus_predictions_2012.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/nostradamus_predictions_2012.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Nostradamus is noted for having predicted the French Revolution, Napoleon, Adolph Hitler, the atomic bomb, 9-11 atrocity, JFK and RFK Assassinations, and just about everything else that has happened since the time of his predictions. Let's look at the incredible 'accuracy' of these predictions.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Refutation of Young Earth Creationism from the Scriptures</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/refutation_of_young_earth_creationism.pdf</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/refutation_of_young_earth_creationism.pdf</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Parallel creation accounts demonstrate from the scriptures why the young earth creationism's interpretation fails the test of biblical coherency.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Prayer for Healing: What Does Science Say?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/prayer_for_healing.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/prayer_for_healing.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 04:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Numerous other prayer studies have shown little of no effect of distant intercessory prayer. However, this study, using proximal intercessory prayer showed that it was effective in improving both hearing and vision in subjects personally prayed for.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Why is There Something Instead of Nothing?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/why_is_there_something.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/why_is_there_something.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Atheists say they have the answer to why there is something rather than nothing—the nothing created it! However, their explanation takes science and turns it on its head—performing miracles of creation through unknown physics or mechanisms that are extremely unlikely to occur.</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
