One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest?
No, this page is not about the 1975 movie staring Jack Nicholson. However, atheists are up in arms thinking that Professor Antony Flew has lost his mind. Flew, age 81, has been a legendary proponent and debater for atheism for decades, stating that "onus of proof [of God] must lie upon the theist."1 However, in 2004, Prof. Flew did the unheard of action of renouncing his atheism because "the argument to Intelligent Design is enormously stronger than it was when I first met it."2 In a recent interview, Flew stated, "It now seems to me that the findings of more than fifty years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument to design." Flew also renounced naturalistic theories of evolution:
"It has become inordinately difficult even to begin to think about constructing a naturalistic theory of the evolution of that first reproducing organism."3
In Flew’s own words, he simply "had to go where the evidence leads."4 According to Flew, "...it seems to me that the case for an Aristotelian God who has the characteristics of power and also intelligence, is now much stronger than it ever was before."2 Flew also indicated that he liked arguments that proceeded from big bang cosmology. However, Antony Flew does not believe in the existence of a good God who is involved in the lives of human beings, because of the problem of evil. He ascribes very much to the God of Einstein and Spinoza, who created the universe and life on earth and left the scene. He does not believe in an afterlife.
For a man who has spent decades promoting atheism, this decision came as quite a shock to atheists and theists alike. As a former agnostic, I followed a similar path through my undergraduate studies in biology. I became a deist in 1973 after realizing that the naturalistic theories on the origin of life were not plausible. Today, the evidence against abiogenesis is much stronger than even at that time. Therefore, I believe that, at a minimum, deism is the logical choice regarding the question of God.
Read Antony Flew's new book, There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind
Related Pages 
-
Atheist
Becomes Theist: Exclusive Interview with Former Atheist Antony Flew - Famed atheist concedes: evidence points to God
- BBC Interview with Professor Antony Flew 22nd March 2005
- Why are Most Scientists Atheists If There is Evidence for Belief in God?
- Did Albert Einstein Believe in a Personal God?
- There is Too Much Evil and Suffering For God to Exist?
- Religion vs. IQ - Are Religious People Stupid?
- Afamado ateo hace un reconocimiento: La prueba seńala a Dios
References 
- Antony Flew. The Presumption of Atheism (London: Pemberton, 1976), 14.
- Atheist
Becomes Theist: Exclusive Interview with Former Atheist Antony Flew at
Biola University (PDF
version
). - Philosophy Now magazine, August-September 2004. Reported in "Famous Atheist Now Believes in God", ABC news.
- Telephone conversation with Dr. Gary R. Habermas Professor Philosophy and Theology, September 9, 2004.
Today's New Reason To Believe
[Active Archive Link, Click Above]
- 05/09/2008 12:05 AM
Bombarded by Design
David H. Rogstad, Ph.D. “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” — Richard Dawkins, atheist biologist, in The Blind Watchmaker “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was ... - 05/08/2008 12:05 AM
Explanation for Origin-of-Life’s Molecular Handedness is Insoluble
Posted by Fazale ‘Fuz’ Rana, Ph.D. Another Mechanism to Explain Origin of Homochirality Questioned One of my teenage daughters is left-handed. And nobody in our family wants to sit next to her when we eat at the table. It’s not because she has bad manners. It’s because her ... - 05/07/2008 12:05 AM
The Latest WMAP Results
by Jeff Zweerink As scientists gain understanding of the universe of the details of the universe’s features, their knowledge bodes well for the biblically consistent class of big bang models. In early March, the WMAP science team released their latest results derived from five years of ... - 05/06/2008 12:05 AM
Does Christian Disunity Invalidate the Truth-Claims of Historic Christianity? Part 5 (of 5)
Kenneth Richard Samples Throughout this series, I have pointed out that historic Christians enjoy a robust unity in terms of essential beliefs, values, and worldview orientation. (For the first three articles, see here, here, and here.) In the fourth installment I proposed two suggestions for ... - 05/05/2008 12:05 AM
Evolution as Mythology, Part 1 (of 5): The Theory of Evolution is a Myth
Editor’s note: Today we present an article by guest scholars Dr. Hugh Henry, Ph.D. , Daniel J. Dyke, M.Div., M.Th., and Dr. Charles Cruze, Ph.D. The creation-evolution debate is usually framed as science v. religion: verifiable fact v. faith. But we contend that it takes at least as much faith ... - 05/02/2008 12:05 AM
Earliest Direct Evidence of Life
David H. Rogstad, Ph.D. In his book Origins of Life, Dr. Fazale Rana reviews the extensive indirect evidence for the appearance of primitive life on Earth as early as 3.5 billion years ago (bya), with some indications that it may have appeared as early as 3.8+ bya. The later date is supported by ... - 05/01/2008 12:05 AM
Anthropologists “Headed” in Right Direction about Hobbits’ Identity
Posted by Fazale ‘Fuz’ Rana, Ph.D. New research confirms affinity between H. floresiensis and H. erectus For the last few weeks I have discussed the controversy surrounding Homo floresiensis. (Go here and here to read the past articles.) At times, it seems like anthropologists are all ...
Last Modified August 20, 2007



