<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Evidence for God from Science</title>
		<link>http://www.godandscience.org/</link>
		<description>Provides evidence for the existence of God and the reliability of the Bible from scientific studies.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 June 2013 15:18:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		<atom:link href="http://www.godandscience.org/godandscience.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>The Genesis One Code by Daniel Friedmann Book Review</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/genesis_one_code.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/genesis_one_code.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 June 2013 15:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The Genesis One Code is an interpretation of Genesis one primarily based upon the Jewish mystical teachings of the Kabbalah. Although well written and interesting, the book's premise results in some rather awkward and forced 'reconcilation' of Genesis with science.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Flood Geology: Biblical Location of Garden of Eden Contradicts Young Earth Paradigm</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/flood_geology.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/flood_geology.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 16:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Geological observations of Mesopotamia show that the area has been buried by 5-6 miles of rock. Rather than reconsider flood geology, young earth creationist reject the Bible's clear teaching in Genesis 2.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Gospel Truth: The Gospels Are Reliable Even With Many Redactions</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/reliability_of_the_gospels.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/reliability_of_the_gospels.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 02:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Even after redacting 50% of the text, the remaining gospel manuscripts (supported by the parallel accounts and confirmed by the writings 	of the students of the New Testament authors) leave us with a clear picture of Jesus as a miracle worker who claimed to be God, died on the cross for our sins and demonstrated his Deity by rising from the dead.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Corroborative Evidence and the Gospels: Can We Expect it to Verify Every Detail?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/corroborate_the_gospels.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/corroborate_the_gospels.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Evidence that corroborates the eyewitness testimony of the Gospel accounts is usually limited, as skeptics often point out. However, the limited nature of the corroborative evidence from 2,000 years ago shouldn't surprise us.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Christian Faith is Based Upon Evidence</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/evidence_and_christian_faith.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/evidence_and_christian_faith.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Christians can be &quot;case makers&quot; precisely because the Christian faith is an evidential faith. When we, as Christians, argue for the truth of the Christian Worldview, we are not sharing an opinion.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Doubt About God? How Jesus Responded to Doubt</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/doubt_about_god.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/doubt_about_god.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 03:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Even John the Baptist had doubts about who Jesus was. What is illuminating is how Jesus addressed John's doubts.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels Book Review</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/cold-case_christianity.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/cold-case_christianity.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Cold-Case Christianity is the most creative and interesting examination of the case for the validity of the Christian faith ever published. Detective J. Warner Wallace examines the evidence for the truth of Christianity from the perspective of a cold-case detective and proves his case.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Critique of &quot;When Was the Ice Age in Biblical History?&quot;: The Pleistocene is Not in the Bible</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/ice_age_bible.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/ice_age_bible.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Answers in Genesis recently published an article claiming to provide a &quot;biblical&quot; explanation for the ice age, even though it is not even mentioned in the Bible. Instead of providing a reasonable exaplantion, the article forces vast number of lengthy events into a period of 250 years and makes young earth creationism seem ridiculous.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mark 10:6 - Proof the Earth is Young? Was Jesus a Young Earth Creationist?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/mark_10_6_beginning_creation.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/mark_10_6_beginning_creation.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Young earth creationists say that Jesus believed the earth was young and cite Mark 6:10 as &quot;proof.&quot; The verse, cited out of context, seems pretty convincing, &quot;But at the beginning of creation God made them male and female.&quot; Did Jesus really intend this meaning from His teaching?</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>God, Science, and Reason: Finding the Light of God Amidst the Darkness of Atheism and Dogmatism Book Review</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/god_science_and_reason.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/god_science_and_reason.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 04:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>In God, Science, and Reason, Michael Bunner shows how the new atheists fail to evaluate evidence with an unbiased approach, but assume the absence of the supernatural through scientific naturalism and philosophical materialism. The book is a good resource for Christian youth and their parents to counter the anti-theism of the universities.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Why Would God &quot;visit the iniquity of the fathers on the children unto the third and the fourth generation&quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/god_iniquity_third_fourth_generation.html/</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/god_iniquity_third_fourth_generation.html/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Is it fair that God would visit, &quot;the iniquity of the fathers on the children, and on the third and the fourth generations&quot;? Should children be punished for the sins of their parents?</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>