<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Evidence for God from Science</title>
		<link>http://www.godandscience.org/</link>
		<description>Provides evidence for the existence of God and the reliability of the Bible from scientific studies.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		<atom:link href="http://www.godandscience.org/godandscience.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Did Scientists Evolve a Multicellular Organism from a Single-Celled Organism?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/multicellular_evolution.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/multicellular_evolution.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Scientists claimed to have 'evolved' multicellular organisms in a few days through simple laboratory selection. A more likely explanation is that these yeasts conscripted genes already present that form pseudohyphae naturally. Sheering forces from culture shaking likely account for the cell death that resulted in the release of 'juvenile' 'offspring.'</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nostradamus Predictions 2012: The Greatest Prophet of Modern Times?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/nostradamus_predictions_2012.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/nostradamus_predictions_2012.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Nostradamus is noted for having predicted the French Revolution, Napoleon, Adolph Hitler, the atomic bomb, 9-11 atrocity, JFK and RFK Assassinations, and just about everything else that has happened since the time of his predictions. Let's look at the incredible 'accuracy' of these predictions.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Refutation of Young Earth Creationism from the Scriptures</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/refutation_of_young_earth_creationism.pdf</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/refutation_of_young_earth_creationism.pdf</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Parallel creation accounts demonstrate from the scriptures why the young earth creationism's interpretation fails the test of biblical coherency.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Prayer for Healing: What Does Science Say?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/prayer_for_healing.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/prayer_for_healing.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 04:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Numerous other prayer studies have shown little of no effect of distant intercessory prayer. However, this study, using proximal intercessory prayer showed that it was effective in improving both hearing and vision in subjects personally prayed for.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Why is There Something Instead of Nothing?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/why_is_there_something.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/why_is_there_something.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Atheists say they have the answer to why there is something rather than nothing—the nothing created it! However, their explanation takes science and turns it on its head—performing miracles of creation through unknown physics or mechanisms that are extremely unlikely to occur.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kepler 22b: Why it is Almost Certainly NOT Habitable</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/planet_kepler_22b_habitable_zone.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/planet_kepler_22b_habitable_zone.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>NASA's announcement of finding the first &quot;earth-like&quot; planet in the middle of a solar-twin's habitable zone through the Kepler satellite has been one of the most covered stories of recent years. Should we pack our bags and head off to this tropical paradise?</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Early Design in Eyes from Shrimp-like Anomalocaris</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/early_crustacean_eyes.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/early_crustacean_eyes.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The shrimp-like crustacean Anomalocaris represents an supreme predator from the Cambrian era, with advanced compound eyes containing at least 16,000 lenses-even more advnaced than today's crustaceans and arthropods. How did evolution produce such a highly developed design only a few tens of millions of years after the first animal life appeared in the seas?</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>North Carolina's &quot;Woman’s Right to Know Act,&quot;: Informed Consent for Abortion?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/ultrasound_abortion_law.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/ultrasound_abortion_law.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>District Judge Catherine Eagles found North Carolina's Right to Know Act to be possibly unconstitutional, since she said it violated the first amendment rights of doctors. Eagles states that &quot;The First Amendment generally includes the right to refuse to engage in speech compelled by the government,&quot; even though plenty of other informed consent requirements within the medical establishment do compel such &quot;First Amendment violating&quot; speech. Why do abortionists object to speech requirements that involve informed consent? What are they afraid of?</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Origin of Life: Earth's Early Atmosphere Wasn't Reducing</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/earth_early_atmosphere.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/earth_early_atmosphere.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Evidence that the earth's primordial atmosphere was oxidative rather than reducing as early as 4.3 billion years ago has dealt a knockout blow to naturalistic origin of life theories. Since prebiotic chemistry cannot synthesize the building blocks of life under oxidative conditions, scientists are left with the reality that naturalistic origin of life theories cannot explain the origin of life on earth.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tim Tebow: Does God Really Care About Football?</title>
			<link>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/tim_tebow_god.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/tim_tebow_god.html</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 03:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Is Tim Tebow doing so well in football because of his outgoing faith in Jesus Christ? Although God probably has no interest in the win-loss record of the Denver Broncos, He will bless those who praise Him and give Him credit where credit is due.</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
